|
Dear Friend of the IRR,
Where are your retirement savings? Do you have money in a pension fund?
If so, your savings might be in danger.
The point of a pension fund is to invest money for
your future. The job of financial and asset managers is to manage your investments so that
the return on your investment is as high as possible.
But if the ANC were to implement their prescribed assets policy, asset managers would be forced
to invest a percentage of their clients’ money in government assets, such as government
bonds and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) like Eskom.
Government bonds and SOEs can be good investments, and if they are, then the government doesn't
have to force asset managers to invest their clients’ money in them. But we know that in South
Africa, that is not necessarily the case: the government does not spend money well, which means that
if we give it more money through prescribed assets, it will
be wasted on bailouts, debt servicing, and corruption.
A win for the IRR, but the fight is not over
The IRR first flagged the ANC’s prescribed assets policy as a threat in early 2019 and immediately
launched a campaign against it. We asked South Africa’s largest
financial and asset management
companies: were they willing to hand the government
money their clients have entrusted to them?
The media and the financial sector accused us of stirring panic, but we doubled down our efforts.
In the meantime, sector insiders alerted us to the fact that negotiations between sector leaders
and the Presidency had been underway for months. The financial sector was getting ready to
sell out their clients.
We then launched a letter-writing campaign prompting the public to ask their own financial providers
about prescribed assets. When we were informed of management memos warning staff that nobody was to
engage with the IRR on prescribed assets, we knew we were on the right track.
Finally, in September 2020, Magda Wierzycka publicly accused the IRR of
blackmail when we
engaged with her about the position of her company, Sygnia Ltd, on the issue
of prescribed assets and stated that we would make our correspondence with her public on social media.
Though untrue, Wierzycka’s blackmail claim focused
national attention on prescribed assets and the IRR’s fight against it.
The IRR’s campaign not only halted the looting of
pensions and savings for years, but also ensured a fundamental shift in attitude within the financial industry.
When the ANC included prescribed assets in its recently released election manifesto, the attitude shift in the
industry was clear: Wierzycka herself has taken a strong stance
against the policy, writing on Twitter: “First they rob South Africans through taxes. Then by
mismanagement of the economy and the Rand collapse. Now it’s a raid on our retirement savings. BTW most
asset managers already hold 20%+ of government bonds. When is it enough? There is little left.”
We welcome Wierzycka’s strong stance against this disastrous policy and encourage other asset managers and
companies to follow her lead and help the IRR keep the government’s hands
off the assets South Africans have
worked so hard to earn.
Stopping pro-poverty forces and policies means stirring the pot. It is thanks to your support that we can continue to
stir the pot and fearlessly fight against pro-poverty policies like prescribed assets.
It is also thanks to your support that we can offer pro-growth solutions. Instead
of using South Africans’ savings to fund their overspending, the government should slash waste in public procurement and cut taxes
to fuel economic growth. Find out how in our report, titled “Slash Waste, Cut Taxes”, available on our website.
|